Monday, July 16, 2018

The Amazing World of Gumball Review: The Understanding

"Catch the catch?"

So... I hate having to be prickly from time to time, but this episode was a mess. Every once in a while, even the best television shows will leave you with an episode that just utterly baffles you in terms of how it got into fruition, and I'll be damned if "The Understanding" isn't Gumball's. Sure, the show's had worst episodes, but there's never been one this ridiculously perplexing in its existence. It's just an episode that tries too much. While I usually admire the show going balls to the wall with some fantastically insane premise, here, it pays off very little, or at the very least far from the desired effect. Let's break down why.

The largest issue with "The Understanding" is that it wants to take advantage of shock humor. I can see the logic there and why the writers thought it would be a fun idea: the episode is framed around Peter Pepperoni, who Gumball and Darwin are completely unable to decode in how strangely he speaks, so they decide to just nod in agreement with everything. This, however, backfires when it turns out he was talking about him and his parents' abhorrence for the government and inviting them on a heist of town hall records.

The issue is that, to make the premise happen, the episode splits itself into two wildly different pieces, and both aren't given a balanced amount of depth to really bridge together as a cohesive unit. As a result, while the twist is a legitimate shock, it feels unearned, and everything that follows just flies by like a confusing fever dream.

It's not like "The Understanding" is really, in the first few minutes, given much room to improve. Peter Pepperoni is introduced with the sole personality trait of being unable to speak comprehensively, and all it does is try the audience without really evolving. It just becomes a game of Gumball and Darwin trying to be tactically evasive. All of this, of course, is build-up for the big tonal switcheroo, but it takes five minutes to get to that point, at which point the pacing just feels deadening with the exception of a few inspired jokes serving as catharsis to help coax the audience through it. (The brief sliver of Principal Brown trying to figure out a xylophone chime and giving a particularly unnecessary intercom announcement is probably the episode's most enjoyable moment, for whatever that's worth.)

The big twist, meanwhile, is so opposed to how the rest of the episode goes that it doesn't really land. Siciliana and Quattro, Peter's parents, slowly reveal themselves to be rather suspicious before straight-up leading a heist on the town hall, and from that point on, there's just no room for the episode to really build intensity. Instead, we get a cute series of character interactions built around loose legal papers flying across Elmore which, while assuring some decent laughs, serves to immediately deflate the shock the episode seems so bent on establishing before roaring back into 11 for the big finish.

The only things that really work about "The Understanding," and the only things that are truly constant, are Gumball and Darwin. In an episode threatening to just take a straight nosedive, the two help anchor everything that's happening by keeping some foot, at least by some strange internal logic, in reality. It's fun to see them get dragged through everything after committing something so forseeably harmless, but the overall lack of discipline to how the plot is actually laid out always threatens to throw off that balance (and generally succeeds).

I know that this review is overwhelmingly negative, and there's certainly some good that I'm omitting, but the issues of the episode far overwhelm it, at least for me. Everything about "The Understanding" is just rough around the edges; it has an interesting idea, but it never really thinks out how to package it, and the end result is a bit too chaotic and disorganized to work.

Notes and Quotes:
-In case you were curious, Peter's character employs what is referred to in comedy as "double-talk," or deliberately unintelligible speech; it's sort of like how uncanny valley works for robots, but linguistic. If you're interested in hearing what else it can sound like, check out Vanessa Bayer's Dawn Lazarus character from SNL or Reggie Watts.
-"Well, I can see why you came to us. You want a pair of guys down with the streets, just a couple of cool dudes who are so confident in their fashion choices they haven't changed their outfits in six years."
-"I've been nodding so much I developed a six-pack here [on the neck]! I say we get out of here before my neck gets scouted for a football scholarship."
-"It still could be his birthday." "Who'd hold a kid's party at the town hall?" "I don't know. Maybe instead of a clown tripping over his long shoes, there's a democratically-elected official making minor administrative errors?"
-Mr. Robinson's multiple failed attempts to light a match to set his and Mrs. Robinson's certificate of marriage on fire was fun, but having her just hand him a lighter outright was a great way to give the joke just that extra oomph. (Also, they can argue all they want, but that's some chemistry there.)
-"What is going on here?!" "Oh, I thought Peter explained all of this to you." "Yeah, he might've!"
-I didn't really mention it in the review because I couldn't wedge it in, but the ultimate resolution, with Peter delivering a dramatic exposition to spare his parents from going to jail in his trademark incoherence, just barely lands, and it only really works because Doughnut Sheriff is too lazy to write it for evidence. Otherwise, it's somewhat a point of convergence for the two plot-lines, but the connection is still too lose not to feel disjointed.
-Lastly, it's worth noting that "The Understanding" is the latest episode not to feature Ben Bocquelet as a writer. Given those episodes' routinely spotty track record, maybe that's partially to blame for the episode's issues.

FINAL GRADE: C. "The Understanding" is an episode that just puts too much on its plate. It wants to shove together a multitude of ideas, but none of them really work, and the pay-off comes across as nothing but shock humor for the sake of shock humor. There has to be some logical grounding in whatever pans out from episodes like this, or the show has to at least surrender itself more to one of its halves (either Peter's inability to speak or the Pepperonis being anti-government conspiracy nutjobs), but the tonal shift doesn't register because of how much it feels like the idea is forced upon the narrative. I applaud how far the show wanted to push its premise, but in a rare turn of events, it pushed too hard, damaging the episode's potential in the process.

For the last Gumball review of "The Transformation," CLICK HERE.

16 comments:

  1. It could have been worse. A lot of people were expecting it to be a rehash of the season two episode "The Boombox" (the one that introduced Juke the boombox-headed kid). Whether they overall enjoyed it or not, they were surprised that the pizza-headed couple from "The Job" finally got an episode focused on them and that the show has once again given up on being for kids by referencing domestic terrorism and people who want to overthrow the government. Mess or not, that's gotta be worth something.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think it's really worth much. If anything, I was rooting for a headcanon where the child is unable to speak because it was the pizza that Gumball and Darwin dropped in "The Job." Using new characters isn't exactly enough to warrant praise, especially considering that Peter has such a limited framework that you really can't use him much further.

      Also, I really liked "The Boombox" even if nobody else did, and I just want to throw that out there. Season 2 was great.

      Delete
    2. The Boombox is very underrated.

      Delete
    3. It is, isn't it? Nobody talks about Season 2 anymore...

      Delete
  2. Greetings, Matt! I've been reading your reviews for quite a while (since late Season 5 of Gumball), and I cannot simply congratulate you enough about how well you've covered what is possibly the best modern comedy on Cartoon Network! Let's just say I've finally found the courage to actually give you some feedback, even though you could easily destroy me in a debate.

    The Understanding would actually warrant an adequate B- rating in my pseudointellectual opinion. It's probably due to the fact that I might not care about an episode utilizing individual premises to their full potential as much as you. In fact, while I did indeed find the first half of the episode to be half-baked (I know. Kill me), the reveal that the Pepperonis were extreme anarchists managed to pull the whole product out of lukewarm waters, at least for me.

    The Pepperonis honestly seem like exaggerations of one of the Watterson's core traits: rebelling against society. I believe that the purpose of The Understanding was more to give Gumball and Darwin some sort of warning that things will go very, very wrong the next time the Wattersons cause town chaos, possibly foreshadowing events leading up to the series finale? Maybe I'm just shooting at a target without a bullseye, but the Pepperonis' willingness to cling onto similar thinkers and Peter's double-speak as a result of Old World-conditioning might also be the writers' apology for over-Americanizing topics in Season 5. Feel free to debate with me, I'd even appreciate it!

    Just to sidebar from one of your points: I do have an episode of Gumball that baffled ME: The Deal. I agree that Richard in this episode was nearly flawless in this episode, and that the premise of rewriting The Hero, but with Nicole doubting Richard instead showed signs of potential for the episode. What killed it for me, however, was the alienating tone and execution of the episode as a Gumball fan. The kids are portrayed as generic as possible, when we could have gotten Gumball, Darwin, and Anais's separate views of their father's credibility or ideas to show why he's under-appreciated by their mother. Nicole's characterization is particularly jarring: while I did enjoy her ego-filled rap and phone calls, I didn't appreciate my favorite character getting flanderized into the naggy-and-braggy modern Lois Griffin archetype. While the 1st half of The Deal was serviceable, the 2nd ventured into BAD territory for me, mainly due to everyone except Richard losing their personality, referential humor just for the sake of it, and the fact that potential was missed: the kids becoming goblins suggests that Nicole's parenting is rather demonic, and the episode could have made her realize her more abusive tendencies. The final product would likely scrape up a middling C- from me, since its bland humor and jarring characterization seemed reminiscient of a modern Family Guy knockoff, what with the idiot dad, naggy but spineless wife, and misbehaving children. Sure, The Worst and The Ex are worse, but The Deal's lack of character makes it the most baffling episode of Gumball for me.

    Whoo! Sorry about going off on a tangent, I just genuinely appreciate your dissections of a damn great cartoon and wanted to spark some debates myself! So... yeah. Feel free to address my claims!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Was The Deal really trying to rewrite The Hero?

      If anything I feel like The Father was way closer to that. It's not like The Hero wasn't kind of a rewrite of The Laziest in the first place.

      Delete
    2. Good point. Maybe I meant to say that The Deal tried to be The Hero, but with some roleswitches: Nicole doubts Richard instead, and all three kids support him (it's hard to determine whether Nicole is more OOC when she's defending Richard in The Hero, but committing child abuse, or when she calls Richard a terrible parent, and loses her ability to kick butt).

      Delete
    3. Hi, Yolo Chip! It's always interesting to see when my regular readers decide to come out of the shadows and make themselves known! (I'm a nice person, you know...)

      I'm not sure how much I can agree with you on what you're saying in your third paragraph. Gumball is the sort of show that's smart and knows how to perform meta-commentary, but when it does so, it wants to make itself known; the way you're trying to interpret "The Understanding" seems a bit too covert. More than anything else, it's just trying to show the consequences of Gumball and Darwin trying to take the easy route in life while addressing the fact that there's some situations that even they don't have the dexterity to get out of. I also don't think the show's writers are particularly apologetic of Season 5's general shortcomings, as they haven't exactly acknowledged any negative feelings about it in the same way they have about Season 1.

      I'll admit, too, that "The Deal" is one of my least favorite episodes from the series, but I don't find it bad. It's just annoyingly generic, though that, to me, is even worse. I think my review of it back in the day hit up those points fairly well too: it tries to do a lot, but it lacks the crucial insight to making any of it land. There's a solid concept to it, but if you never actively take hold of it or try to do anything interesting with it, everything just sinks. The greatest issue, though, is just that it wants to be a character piece, all while painting the characters as particularly one-dimensional, and that atrophies any ability for growth.

      Sorry if my response is kind of short and underwhelming, but these episodes are so recent in my mind that I've pretty much discussed every thought I have about them! Feel free to comment anytime you want in the future, though!

      Delete
    4. I apologize if it seems rather late for a reply from me on this post at this point in time, but I feel obliged to.

      At this point, I'd still give The Understanding a slight benefit of the doubt considering I don't find the two halves entirely disconnected. The episode definitely could have used some brushing up in the writing department, so this segment sits on the border of B- and C+ for me.

      As for The Deal, you could argue that a C- is bad by TAWoG's standards. For me, a D grade would be bad by animation standards, a grade I'd likely assign to The Worst, and maybe The Ex. (By the way, I don't know whether Blogger gives you notifications for older blogposts, but I wrote one of my signature unnecessarily long comments on your "The Worst" review.
      Plus I'm on the Gumball subreddit now)

      Delete
    5. C grades aren't good, but there's a special place for episodes that get stuck in the D-range, and it's dictated entirely by quality and not medium. Off the top of my head, some animated examples include "The Genius," "High Strangeness" from Adventure Time, and "The Other Bin of Scrooge McDuck!" from DuckTales. It generally stems from abject incoherency or doing something as to throw the integrity of the show into question. "The Understanding" just dips close to that point from a convolution standpoint; "The Deal" is an episode that isn't bad outright but suffers in how frustratingly boring it is, which is just hard to evaluate in general.

      Delete
    6. Granted, I'm bound to giving harsher grades to specific episodes of shows like a lot of critics. I suppose you never review anything that warrants an F in your opinion, but I can come up with various episodes of Spongebob, The Loud House, and Teen Titans GO! as downright awful from my viewpoint.

      Delete
    7. If a show constantly raises concerns for its quality, I just wouldn't waste my time. That's why low grades are exceptionally rare for me.

      Delete
  3. I think the two halves of these episodes would have meshed together better if everything Peter was blabbering about was actually related to the Pepperoni's disdain government. Not only would it make the plot more cohesive, but it would add some great rewatch value with trying to decipher Peter's double talk and whatnot.

    That aside, I found some of the jokes solid despite the somewhat disconnected narrative. As always, Gaylord and Margaret Robinson never cease to make me laugh with their dying marriage. The joke of Gaylord failing to burn their marriage license only for Margaret to step in with a proper lighter was easily the episode's best moment. Likewise, Gumball acknowledging that he and Darwin have been wearing the same clothes for years was a nice meta jab, but it would have landed slightly better if Gumball said seven years instead of six given that, you know, 2011 was seven years ago, not six.

    I just do not have too much to say about the episode.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yeah, I think Peter's double-talking could've been planned out a bit better. I get trying to disconnect both pieces to make the twist land with as much shock as it can, but it also just produces a gap in the logical flow that instantly deems those two minutes leading up to it almost worthless. Writing this sort of stuff is a balancing act, and the show goes all in, but it could've worked harder to give everything a stronger core.

      Also, in terms of that clothes joke, keep in mind that "The Understanding" was probably written and in production through some point in the six year mark, so at the time it made sense, though they could've forecasted its release date a bit better.

      Delete
  4. God damn it it's the third time I attempt to leave you a comment I wrote two messages before... but well:

    The shock humor did land for me. I agree that this episode wasn't enough organized and the side jokes hurted the plot but I think it has nice things we could appreciate of it.

    The jokes were good the democratically-elected official and Mr's Robinson's especially, they were suited for another kind of episode they didn't blend too well with the action but still they were funny, maybe they would actually reserve a really shock moment for the ending only instead of trying to build that scene, the ending was so bland as you said it never tied the two plots but it could be a crucial point to arrange everything better.

    I think it still has good things to look for, the two parts were consistent enough even if they never blended too well, and as I said the shock worked for me, it's just messy and they needed to build up better the shocking humor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know. I think I was so tired of what the episode was trying to do that the shock just didn't land for me at all. I lacked investment, and the show came at my vying for it, but it didn't have enough coherency for me to appreciate it so much as be caught off-guard, but ultimately more confused than anything else. The episode didn't let its twist breath, it just adhered an insane plot point onto a less-than-stellar episode.

      Delete