Thursday, June 13, 2019

The Amazing World of Gumball Review: The Revolt

"STOP OBJECTIFYING OBJECTS!"

Remember how, in my last review, I said that when all is right, Gumball's writers sure know how to make an episode fly? Yeah... this is what happens when that fails.

Gumball is, indisputably, a show that puts comedy first, and there's nothing inherently wrong with that. Whereas cartoons are generally headed in a more serious, narratively-driven direction, Gumball is one of the last strong shows working episodically with the central focus of being fun, and that prevents it from being as weighed down as its contemporaries in the sense that anything can happen. While that usually plays out to the show's benefit, though, there's a lot of ways it can go wrong, with writers instead using the opportunity to go sloppily apeshit in pursuit of some self-destructive idea that works against the show, because as I said, anything can happen, right?

"The Revolt" isn't just one of those episodes: it's the epitome of everything going as roughly as you could imagine. It suffers every single issue that a Gumball episode possibly could, and whereas there's quite a few episodes that unfortunately fall victim to a few issues, "The Revolt's" licked a few too many doorknobs, and it's just sweltering with grotesque infection.

And here's the thing: I don't particularly enjoy having to write negatively about the show, especially in knowing that so many people who work on it appreciate these reviews, so let me be clear: I, by no means, am out to insult anyone's work. Creating an 11-minute episode of a show from start to finish like Gumball is hard to do, and the fact that the writers, artists, animators, and everyone else involved are able to create something like it is a testament to how wonderful of a show they can put out. But as much as I hate disparaging an episode like this, I'd hate lying to myself about it more. When the show's crawling up its own ass with a little too much excitement, I want to be able to call that out: I'm pulling the red card on this one.

This is what happens when the show wants to make a point but has no idea how, and ultimately favors humor instead that works against said point. It's a rare occurrence, but this time, "The Revolt" attempts to call out virtue signalling and speaking on behalf of those being discriminated against, though through the conceptualization of Darwin attempting to deliver peace unto the mistreated objects of Elmore. There's already a sort of logical inconsistency to the episode—what even qualifies as an object? Why are some objects alive while others are dismissed even by the objects themselves?—and while that serves to demonstrate how ill-advised of an idea "The Revolt" has from the get-go, it's one of the episode's lesser problems.

There's definitely a satirical point "The Revolt" wants to make, and it had a chance of being fairly incisive, but it serves no point in the plot aside from advancing it into irrelevance with the reveal that the objects decide to revolt when they discover that people have a tendency to throw them out while they're still usable. Suddenly, none of the character work Darwin is forced to carry even matters. None of the build-up or conversation points Gumball brings up over the past seven minutes even matters. Nothing about the episode matters. It's lazily nihilistic, disguising its apathetic efforts as satire when it has no message it wants to get across. Cue the episode doing another of its numerous montages, though this time set to jarringly unfit synth music.

I suppose it was pretty clear upfront that the nexus of this entire episode was some writer coming up with the phrase, "Stop objectifying objects," and everyone else just piling on ideas until there was enough bloat to make an episode out of it, but the ending is so out-of-sync with the rest of the episode that anything it had going for it completely dissipates, and all we're left with is Darwin being sodomized with a pencil, which... I feel like there's a sort of gross, gray area for that type of joke, though I suppose even the faintest bit of shock to the system, by that point, warrants merit. It certainly doesn't help wash down the fact, though, that the writers have fallen back on their habit of taking advantage of the status quo in lieu of making an ending that reconnects the dots.

And yet I feel like the most disappointing thing about "The Revolt" is how much effort was put into such a dully-executed idea. The idea that the objects of Elmore have life is already derivative in and of itself, being pulled directly from Season 2's "The World," but no matter how decadent this episode tries to get to elevate that premise, with its dramatic Les Misérables-esque musical numbers, and countless montages, and attempts at dark and off-color humor, there's no chance for it to succeed. Instead, it exists in the shadow of other episodes that it wishes to join as an ambitious misstep.

Notes and Quotes:
-"Just let them do their jobs. Trying to convince them otherwise is like trying to stop a soccer mom from asking to speak to the coach: it's not gonna happen."
-"Look, these objects don't know any better. They're like British people in the sun: they don't miss what they've never seen."
-Personally for me, the only joke that really registered was Gumball ordering a new phone and discarding his own one in only a few seconds at the worst time possible: quick, to-the-point, and silly.
-Gen Z Reality Check: I'm sure many other people my age have explored themselves and their anatomy with pencils, but keep it dull. Or use one of those Squiggle Wiggle pens.

FINAL GRADE: D+. This is the worst episode of the series that I've ever had to review. While "The Revolt" can easily be accepted as simply a mistaken one-off that doesn't represent the quality of the series as a whole (and in the grand scheme of things, that's what I'm choosing to do), it just serves to exemplify what happens when every little thing about Gumball goes wrong, with misplaced intentions getting lost in pursuit of poorly-constructed humor. While I might've been a little bit less critical of the episode had it come out earlier in the show's run, the fact that it exists as one of the last entries into the series makes it nothing more than an unequivocal disappointment and a weirdly graceless blemish on the series' name.

For the last Gumball review of "The Heart," CLICK HERE.

For updates every time I post a new review, follow me on Twitter @Matt_a_la_mode.

6 comments:

  1. Wow, this is the first time I've seen a you give out a "D" for a Gumball episode and one of the only times you've given out a "D" grade in the history of this blog. While this isn't my absolute least favorite episode, it's definitely down there. I love this show, and I genuinely think this last stretch of episodes has produced some amazing hits, but this is not one of them. The team worked hard, and I can appreciate that, but this did not work.

    It would be one thing if this episode was like "The Worst" in regards to how it forces it social commentary. However, not only is the social commentary forced, it's so aimless that the message it's so intent on delivering is littered with inconsistencies and bring about some...interesting implications. Darwin, the stand-in for the social activist, meets constant pushback for his efforts, and the objects, the stand-ins for the oppressed, ultimately reject his charity. Fine enough if the moral is "it's fine to be a social advocate, but don't get in so deep that you end up speaking for the oppressed." However, it is thanks to Darwin that the objects fully comprehend their oppression and how mistreated they are. Had Darwin not interfered, they would have been none the wiser as to what is really happening. So, is the moral now "speak up for those who are oppressed; they can't do anything?" Are the oppressed so oblivious that they are unable to see their own struggling and speak for themselves? Why is Darwin punished even though he was the one person that actually wanted to help the objects and was the one who opened their eyes? What's the message? That we shouldn't bother fighting social injustice because it's virtue signaling except when it is because those oppressed are far too blind to see their own suffering and those who actually try to help them deserve to be condemned? What are you saying? Am I supposed to relate to this as a minority myself?

    In an effort to try to be "woke" and "deep," the show comes out not looking too great. Most of the humor here isn't that great either, with most of the jokes coming across as forced attempts to score easy internet points rather than being genuinely funny. It's "The Worst" amplified, and while I think the series has a few entries that are worse, this is not a good look so late into the game. I love what the Gumball team does, but this isn't their best outing.

    Great article, man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Trust me, I don't like giving shows I love a D-grade, but you gotta do what you gotta do when something like "The Revolt" emerges from the shadows. Y'know. Knock its block off.

      I didn't really deep-dive into the problems with the satire that much itself, aside from just the fact that it didn't work considering how much the ending betrayed any notion of meaningfulness, but Christ, you're totally right about everything. I never really put two and two together about how much the idea of speaking for the oppressed doesn't work when the episode itself implies that the objects are literally too dumb to know otherwise. What is the point of its satire, that you should keep the oppressed out of the loop or else they'll rebel? Because that's just really, really dumb on a lot of levels.

      More than anything else, there's just such a sense that, for the first time in a long time, if not ever, Gumball as a show has literally no idea what it's talking about. Even in "The Worst," there's a sense that the writers had an angle, even if the end result was fairly obnoxious; "The Revolt" just can't figure out what it wants to do, and manages to make every incorrect move all the way to ending the episode with a rape joke. I love Gumball, I really do, and it's one of my favorite shows, and that's why I want to see better than this from it because I know they're a bunch of the smartest cookies writing in animation. If anything, that just makes "The Revolt" all the more inexcusable.

      Delete
    2. I don’t mean to be rude, but this perspective that the ending is meaningless may be a result of not understanding what the episode is referencing.

      The episode follows the rise and end point of communism and parodies very well the Marxist ideology. Darwin represents the intelligencia (the educated elites who believe in Marxism) and the objects represent the proletariat working class. The objects’ satisfaction with “being objectified” is referencing the notion of “false consciousness,” in which the working class are convinced by the ruling system that they are happy being used.

      The end of the episode reveals the end of Marxism in practice, in which the working class rises up against the ruling class only to flip the hierarchy and reinstate the same oppressive system, but with themselves on top.

      Very well done and very relevant to today. To understand more, I recommend reading about Herbert Marcuse and critical theory.

      Delete
    3. I don’t know why it published three times 😑 sorry

      Delete
  2. D+. Wowies! That's like a better F, but a little better. This episode got an even worse rating than The Worst (oh, the irony!).
    I must say, when I first realized what this is about, it brought a smile to my face because I, too, sometimes feel the same way about objects and you know what it means to share a characteristic with Darwin for a boy like me. I recall not wanting to play with a ball one day because I didn't wanna hurt it. Those were the days...
    Anyway, if I try my best to look past the "yey im darwon" and take an objective (pun intended) stance towards the episode, it does seem pretty bad.
    Usually I watch the episode, enjoy it and think about it deeply afterwards (most likely while reading your review).
    When thinking about it, some questions did pop up. What's the message? Why did the objects join that song if they were completely satisfied with their lives? Why did they, when punishing people, also choose to punish Darwin if he's the one fighting on their side? Also, I was really shocked to see that joke about Darwin being the sharpener twice in the episode! Geepers, was that unexpected.
    Anyway, since this episode does mean something to me for reasons, I don't think it's the absolute bottom of the show. In fact, I enjoyed some of the references (I feel proud for getting the one with those drawers slowly approaching Tobias). Still, though, it could've been better if it at least had an actual message.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Personally, I've always found the idea of what objects could be thinking to be humorous in and of itself, like creating dramatic monologues told from the perspective of a neglected desk lamp or something... but the problem is that no matter how much of an interesting inkling there might be to an idea, it's the execution that matters the most, and "The Revolt" just wasn't executed well at all. Bad execution makes for a bad score, because regardless of intention, if they did a bad job, they're facing the reprehensibility of my admittedly meaningless, and ultimately non-job-threatening evaluations.

      Delete